﻿ Marco states that 7.696696669…… is a rational number because it is a repeating decimal. is he correct? justify  , 22.06.2019 03:00, Ryvers

# Marco states that 7.696696669…… is a rational number because it is a repeating decimal. is he correct? justify your answer. ### Other questions on the subject: Mathematics Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:00, ineedhelp2285
What is the scale factor of this dilation Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:30, marianaescamilla404
Scenario: susan wants to make 2 square flags to sell at a crafts fair. the fabric she wants to buy is 3 meters wide. she doesn't want any fabric left over. what's the least amount of fabric she should buy? question: which equation will susan solve her problem? note: let x represent the length of 1 side of the flag. options: 1) 2x^2 = 4x 2) 8 +2x = 2(4x) 3) 2 * 2 = 4 * 2 4) 4x^2 -2x = 0 Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:40, afrimart1
Solve these problems: 1.what is the perimeter of an equilateral triangle with sides measuring 6cm? 2. a regular pentagon has sides measuring 3.2 cm. what is its perimeter? 3. a regular decagon has sides of 3.5mm . what is it’s perimeter? 4. a regular octagon has a perimeter of 64cm. what is the length of one of the sides? 5. a regular hexagon has a perimeter of 72mm . what is the length of one of the sides? 6. what is the perimeter of a rhombus with sides measuring 11m? Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:30, trinitymarielouis
Kevin has a spinner that has 10 equal sections and 2 sections of each color—red, blue, green, yellow, and purple. kevin spins the spinner 180 times. kevin determines about how many times the spinner will land on red or green, and his work is shown below. -kevin has the formula reversed; it should be the total number of sections over the number of red or green sections. -kevin should have used a 4 in the numerator because there are 2 red sections and 2 green sections. -kevin should multiply by the number of sections in the spinner rather than the total number of spins. -kevin calculated the prediction correctly and did not make any mistakes.
Do you know the correct answer?
Marco states that 7.696696669…… is a rational number because it is a repeating decimal. is he correc...

### Questions in other subjects:      Mathematics, 06.05.2020 22:04    Total solved problems on the site: 13552588